Virtual Diegest (ISPaR) · T-RFLP Analysis (APLAUS+) · T-RFLP Analysis (PAT+) · P.S.P.A. · E.R.P.A.
July 28, 2014
  MiCA: Frequently Asked Questions
Do you know ...
The binary encoding scheme enables the search to be performed with a series of binary operations, which effectively reduces the search complexity, and increases performance. This compact representation also permits an accurate search, which is not possible with the character-based approaches.

How do I enter a primer sequence that is degenerate?
MiCA amplification algorithms recognize degenerate bases defined by IUPAC/IUB. For example, the degenerate base W in the primer sequence GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG (Eub-536r) will be resolved to A and T before the search begins.

On the output pages, what do the forward and reverse numbers represent exactly?
Consider this example,
"Forward","Reverse","Accession","Locus","Organism"
22,310,"FCUI553","FCUI553","FCUI553"
The number, 22, refers to the size of the fragment, from the first nucleotide of the forward primer to the last nucleotide of the first restriction site digested by the enzyme. The number, 310, refers the the size of the fragment, from the reverse primer to the last restriction site digested by the enzyme. Think of PCR experiments you will do in the tube. If the capillary instrument had the perfect resolution, these are the sizes the machine will report.

Is there a way to bypass the need for the reverse fragment data? I have tRFLP data that was generated with only the forward primer being labeled.
If you only have forward fragments, use PAT+ instead. However, the reverse primer is still required to perform in silico amplifications and digestions.

I created a database with several restriction digestions but several organisms have the same fragment sizes. How do I resolve these species?
If the organisms that produce the same fragments belong to the same genus, you should probably try different restriction enzymes. Use the enzyme resolving power analysis tool to see which enzyme gives the most number of unique fragments. On the other hand, if these organisms do not belong to the same genus, you should probably try different primers. The primers you are not sufficiently specific.

Do I have to use both labeled forward and reverse primers for tRFLP?
For tRFLP to resolve species adequately, it is recommended to use both labeled forward and reverse primers. Restriction fragments generated from a single primer typically is not sufficiently accurate for species identification. For a really complex community such as soil, multiple restriction enzymes are much needed.

I did not get any results from the ERPA (enzyme resolving power analysis). What seems to be the problem?
If you could not get any results, perhaps it is the primers and number of mismatches (search sensitivity) you chose. Try different parameters and see if you get the results.

Is there any way I can upload my database to MiCA?
Currently, there is no way for users to upload their own databases to MiCA. If you have a customized database you would like to use on MiCA, you can send it to me (shyu at starlab.phys.uidaho.edu). Make sure you zip up the file first before send it to me.

I would like to know where some of the primers listed on MiCA are from, such as Eub-536r, ...
The primer sequences are largely collected from the literatures in AEM (Applied and Environmental Microbiology). I do not have the complete reference.

It is possible to use only one labeled primer for tRFLP analysis?
APLAUS+ requires both forward and reverse fragments. If you only used one labeled primer, presumably forward primer, please use PAT+ intead.

Can MiCA compare multiple tRFLP profiles from a single sample using different enzymes?
No, it is not possible. Multiple profiles must be handled manually. Uploading multiple profiles to MiCA for analysis introduces huge technical complexity. The association among different fragments becomes an impossible for MiCA to complete in a reasonable amount of time. MiCA used to be able to handle multiple profiles. However, most people found it difficult to work with on the web interface.

Would it be possible for you to allow linking of your tools to other sequence databases than those specified?
Currently, it is not possible yet. I guess the answer depends on how exactly the links are established.

Is it possible to get a list with the accession number of all matching strains in the PSPA?
Currently, it is not possible yet. The list of accession numbers of all matching strains can be quite large. It might be too cumbersome to show on the web site.

My restriction digests did not produce any results. What was the problem?
If you can not get any results using a particular pair of primer sequences, perhaps you should increase the number of mismatches (increase search sensitivity).

Is it possible to perform restriction digestions on a limited number of sequences from the RDP database?
No, currently it is not possible.

How often does the database get updated?
Well, it depends. I am quite overloaded with work. I will try to keep the databases updated as frequent as possible. If you notice that the database should be updated, please send me an email (shyu at starlab.phys.uidaho.edu)

  m.i.c.r.o.b.i.a.l  c.o.m.m.u.n.i.t.y   a.n.a.l.y.s.i.s  i.i.i
MiCA Home · What's New · F.A.Q. · About MiCA · Online Help · Contact us
If you use the data generated by MiCA in a publication, please cite:
Shyu, C., Soule, T., Bent, S.J., Foster, J.A., Forney, L.J. (2007) MiCA: A Web-Based Tool for the Analysis of Microbial Communities Based on Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms of 16S and 18S rRNA Genes. Journal of Microbial Ecology 53:562-570.

All rights reserved. Copyright ©, University of Idaho, 2007.
Last updated on June 06 2011 14:00:58.